@article{oai:nsg.repo.nii.ac.jp:00004063,
 author = {泉, 良太 and 能登, 真一 and 上村, 隆元 and 佐野, 哲也 and 佐藤, 大樹 and Izumi, Ryota and Noto, Shinichi and Uemura, Takamoto and Sano, Tetsuya and Sato, Taiki},
 issue = {6},
 journal = {作業療法, 0289-4920},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {application/pdf, 論文(Article), リハビリテーション対象患者に対し,EuroQolS-Dimension(以下,EQ-5D)とHealth Utilities Index Mark3(以下,HUI3)の2つの健康効用値尺度を用い,妥当性・反応性の検証を行った.140名を対象とし,日本語版EQ-5D,日本語版HUI3,FIMについて調査し初期評価と再評価を行った.その結果,初期評価時における各尺度間の関係は,FIMとEQ-5D,HUI3，EQ-5DとHUI3とも中等度の相関関係を認めた.反応性は,エフェクトサイズと標準化反応平均ともに各尺度で0.57～1.00となり中等度から大きい値を示した.以上より2つの健康効用値尺度は妥当性があり,良好な反応性を表す尺度であることが示された., We inspected the validity and responsiveness of utility measures, specifically the use of EuroQol5-Dimension (EQ-5D) and Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) with patients undergoing rehabilitation.We investigated 140 patients using the Japanese version EQ-5D, the Japanese version HUI3 and FIM. We evaluated the subjects twice. As a result of two separate evaluations, we discovered that the subjects experienced moderate regression at the initial assessment : EQ-5D and HUI3 was r=0. 65(p＜0. 001), FIM and EQ-5D was r=0.62 (p＜0. 001) and FIM and HUI3 was r=0. 59 (p＜0. 001).Regarding responsiveness, effect size and standardized response mean were moderate to large at 0. 57-1. 00 in all measures. In conclusion, these two utility measures have validity and can indicate good responsiveness.},
 pages = {763--772},
 title = {健康関連QOLにおける日本語版健康効用値尺度の妥当性・反応性の検討 : EuroQol5-DimensionとHealth Utilities Index Mark3を用いて},
 volume = {29},
 year = {2010}
}